| Never Give Up Early
            My wife got in a traffic accident in Mills road
            Ventura, in
            May 13, 2002
            .  I hurried to go to the site after
            I received her phone call. A policewoman had come to the scene. My wife told me
            that while she drove her car in a stop and go traffic her car was suddenly hit by
            someone else from behind and her car was pushed forward and hit the cars in front
            of her. A total four vehicles were involved in this accident. 
            One week passed the police report had been issued. Based on police investigation
            the report summary said that the vehicle behind my wife (fourth vehicle) was attempting
            to make a right turn. The driver looked her rear mirror and looked back of my wife’s
            car to see my wife’s car was stopped ahead of her. She could not avoid the collision
            so she hit the back of my wife’s car with a force that pushed it into the vehicles
            in the front. This conclusion was the same as my wife’s statement. 
            Several days later a voice record statement of the drivers in front of my wife had
            been issued by my insurance company. This record statement told a different story.
            It insisted that both drivers in front of my wife reported that they felt the first
            impact was that my wife’s car hit them and then they heard the second impact that
            the fourth vehicle hit my wife’s car. 
            We talked with my insurance staff several times about the fact. They insisted that
            police report might not be the correct one. Because of the story they believed we
            have a 50 to 50% responsibility to this accident therefore the insurance company
            would pay half price of our damages to the vehicle. And we also noticed all three
            of vehicles except the first one were insured by the same company. This conclusion
            will result in less payment of this insurance company.
         
            We could not agree with my insurance company’s conclusion but we did not know how
            to deal with this case. Though my wife’s car had been totally damaged, I had towed
            it to my garage. 
            Five months passed since this accident, one of my previous neighbors, 
                 Mr. John visited my home. While we were talking about the accident,
            he asked me to show him the vehicle. After looking around my wife’s car carefully
            he told me that he saw strong evidence that supported my wife’s statement. He asked
            me for a piece of paper and then drew a rough diagram. Because the fourth vehicle
            was attempting to turn right and had neglected her front her vehicle should hit
            my wife’s car on rear right. My wife’s car received this strong force in rear right
            it should have turned around left and hit the front vehicle with the right side
            of the front of her car. The damages to this car showed this process clearly. If
            my wife’s car hit the car in front her first because her car was going in a straight
            direction the damage should be uniform on the front side. 
            Based on this analysis I drew a clear diagram with the computer and wrote down the
            statement along with the photographs of the damage situation, I bound all of the
            document. 
            We filed a claim in small claim court in the
            Ventura
            county government center. We went to the court on
            October 10, 
2002
            and fought face to face with the lawyer of my insurance company and presented the
            document to the judge. 
            Two weeks later the court sent us the results by mail. 
            We won the case. The insurance company had to pay us the full price of our
            car.
         |